Unlike progressive thinking (which feeds the solidarity movement, PJ and popular in this part of the world) believe that creating wealth above the existing. The opposite is pure deception. Metaphysics. Palmistry.
governance is achieved by restoring rights and freedoms, generating competitiveness and legal stability, but substantially, generating wealth and redistributing it with maximum efficiency to meet as many needs.
governance is achieved by restoring rights and freedoms, generating competitiveness and legal stability, but substantially, generating wealth and redistributing it with maximum efficiency to meet as many needs.
At this point, it is absurd, and even self-destructive thought otherwise: there is no developed country in the world that does not have a strong state, efficient, ubiquitous, planner, there is no developed country do not bet by the market, by regulation (financial, monetary, public goods and services, environmental) for social welfare and the right to development. That is, given the poverty does not go.
Justicialism claims do not give up.
popular discourse may have euphony, ie it may be pleasing to the ear with a set of proclamations for world's poor and with a battery of curses and diatribes against, by eg surplus, capitalism, exploitation and unhappiness. impacting step demonstrations and legitimate constructs as capitalization, productivity, competitiveness and sustainable development.
popular discourse may have euphony, ie it may be pleasing to the ear with a set of proclamations for world's poor and with a battery of curses and diatribes against, by eg surplus, capitalism, exploitation and unhappiness. impacting step demonstrations and legitimate constructs as capitalization, productivity, competitiveness and sustainable development.
Because you can not live all the time smoking opium outdated ideology (with its slogans and revolutionary euphoria), we, too, after reading the article Hilderandt Caesar, which exists in Peru is a great spirit reactionary left. .
And whatever the outcome of the Peruvian electoral process, the next President is in the national obligation to prop up a steady state, a state planner, civil service bureaucrats to truth, to increase the possibilities of doing business, saving, investing, consuming, and above all a social setting conducive , which promotes human development, creating more and better educational opportunities, cultural, leisure, better health services, recreation, transportation, housing and sanitation.
The policy that we live in the country, for better or for worse, is emotional, rough, media, folk. And not based on ideology, or militancy, or party organizations and no public discussion spaces (not talking about pens where people insult to rage) corresponds to practice in the media, from the Academy, from the state and political teaching professions.
We consider that neither Alejandro Toledo, and Keiko Fujimori, and Ollanta Humala, and Luis Castillo and Pedro Pablo Kuzscinski are Víctor Raúl Haya de la Torre and Fernando Belaunde Terry and Luis Bedoya Reyes and Valentin Paniagua Corazao.
Then, as Rousseau would say, "the worst way to remove the fear of children is instilling more fear." César Hildebrandt We believe that it is doing.
We must also be clear that PPK is a lobbyist among all professions, occupations and grades shown and recognized. And, in becoming President of the Republic, will have to postpone or delay their ties or business interests in favor of national interests. Otherwise, the defense mechanisms of the Constitutional the trial of the president, the presidential vacancy, internal control and accountability would be activated. And this should occur relentlessly.
PPK Is voting aggiornamiento favor the Shining Path? How to know. In any case, nothing can prove otherwise, nor with the remaining candidates is the same.
Or Does Hildebrandt suggested that a possible government of Humala would be immune to hiking?
Oscar Contreras Morales .-
By César Hildebrandt.
If you want, how they wanted the Marxists, sharpen the contradictions of Peru and tighten their conflict to the outskirts of the drama, is consistent: vote by the American PPK.
This will ensure that the ILO Convention 169 is mocked, the Camisea gas is not sold to the Peruvians, but the Mexicans and Chileans (because that employers should PPK), which remains of Peru is finished (including drinking water and the North Pier) and, finally, we become, against Washington, in an even more bent than the rampant Alvaro Uribe.
PPK is not a Peruvian. That is fine. Nor was Henry Ford. Or Teddy Roosevelt. But neither Ford nor Roosevelt run for president of Peru.
PPK is a rogue lobbyist, a ruthless businessman who plays the winner and has already obtained enough mixing promiscuously from their positions of minister and adviser to various schemes and many foreign companies, public and private.
Moreover, I do not know whether PPK is a truly American. What I do know is which is a cosmopolitan ticket. If tomorrow would war between the U.S. and China, PPK take refuge in the headquarters of the World Bank. Or in some Central Guariquén IMF or the Polish consulate in New York. Because PPK is not Uncle Sam. Papa Johns is!
And I need not say how much would it take to take refuge in the United States Embassy in Lima if Peru would conflict with a neighboring country.
is not forbidden to be an international omnivorous piranha. What is bad taste is that someone who does not believe but the money will come to speak of government policies and social justice.
Boys Class A / B is that it has been believed. Is that so anarchists, so nihilistic, so as metalheads that computer and do not mind being a voracious alien disguised as a flutist's rule. Overall, if many of their parents knelt before a Japanese citizen, why not PPK? Overall, if Peru is still a mine, a parcel, a whorehouse, one denounced, by cutting down a forest and mountains of gold that give the outsider, is not consistent expatriate vote for a wildly successful with more than one passport? Is not the Man Without Qualities PPK moral hero films made and television paradigm? Is not is cool to be a Michael Douglas in Wall Street?
The problem is that a hypothetical choice of PPK us back to that right pradista that incubated the violent 60's, the leftist coup of 70, the madness of the 80 hikers.
is not the first time the world knows a period of prosperity. Between 1950 and 1975 were, in general a high growth rate. And Peru was not immune to this cycle. The issue is that quarter of a century was used to build the foundations of a modern state and a less balanced.
Today we feel the same.
Prosperity has passed as a fireball in front of the noses of millions of Peruvians.
During this second administration corrupt Garcia For example, the following has occurred:
1. 1. The share of wages in gross domestic product fell from 23.1% in 2006 to 20.9% in 2010.
2. 2. The per capita income-the asshole-grew 24.4%, but real wages fell 6%.
Félix Jiménez reminded us that 77% of the economically active population is in services and trade with an average rate of 650 soles salaries and very low productivity. And we have stressed that between 2006 and 2010, while García Cornejo and filled his pockets a second time, left the country, as foreign investment income 37,000 (trentisiete thousand) million dollars. And how much came of external resources in the same period? For ten billion dollars less than what was.
to persuade Finally, Jiménez educational uses this comparison: in 2010 left the country, as foreign capital gains, 8,900 (eight in 1900) million dollars or 25 billion soles, upper income Annual all the poor of Peru, which peaked at 21 billion suns.
Garcia says we grow. The problem is how. During the regime to end this July, real exports have increased 3.8% per year. Imports in contrast, have grown at an annual rate of 16.6% "Not that we are an export-oriented virtual power? No. Not so.
time ago, invited by the Catholic University, came the American economist Dani Rodrik, Harvard associate professor of school by John Kennedy. Rodrick took care to remind us that there is no true and sustained growth - ie development, but surely there is a process of productivity growth, domestic demand growth and industrialization.
That is what terrifies the Neanderthal of liberalism that have dominated the Peruvian political agenda: coordination between state and private and, in some cases, yes, not horrified: planning. As in South Korea or Singapore.
But it is not possible to conclude whether the national capital is becoming less significant. In 1950 foreign capital represented in Peru, as a percentage of GDP generation, 10 percent. In 1968, when the military stormed the scene nasceríais, and was 22%. After Fujimori in 2000, that figure reached 29%. And in 2007, with Garcia in the fullness of its policy, reached 34.5% of foreign capital to GDP.
why - and many other things, is that in all the surveys on the subject of the economic situation more than 70 percent of the respondents (73.9% in the most recent) requests that the model changes. That's what the conservative press is silent and its phalanx of accompanying voices.
A widespread unrest in Peru. That silenced the press does not mean that there is. That unease has to do with inequalities, with the blindness of the political class, with exclusions, with the corruption with impunity. There is a great feast, but there are millions who look, angry, behind a fence.
If you do not want one but several Bagua, a dry prairie grass and a spark in VRAE, a discontent that radicalize the protests and make the country ungovernable, no doubt, vote for PPK. If you want another April 5, vote for who will not live in a democracy. And if you're thinking of those who need a PPK that ignite the prairie to justify a new dictatorship, then I congratulate you: it goes in the right direction.
And if I was Abimael Guzmán I would be rubbing their hands.
0 comments:
Post a Comment